Agriculture Fair Work
Case Study

Most employers are not HR professionals, so this can lead to them creating HR risk without them even knowing it.

★★★★★Trusted by thousands of Australian businesses · No credit card required

agriculture
agriculture

$130,000

Fair Work penalties

6

backpackers underpaid

$38,254

total underpayment

64-88 days

worked without a day off
(three workers)

Case overview

A Queensland beef cattle farm operator and its company were penalised $130,000 after underpaying six overseas backpackers for their work between January 2014 and September 2015.

The workers, who were employed on working holiday visas, were paid a flat hourly rate of $17 despite regularly working long hours, including overtime. Some worked up to 13 hours a day, six or seven days a week, with three employees working between 64 and 88 consecutive days without a day off.

A Fair Work Ombudsman investigation found the six workers had been underpaid a total of $38,254, with individual employees receiving between 28% and 51% less than their minimum entitlements. The underpayments included overtime, ordinary wages, casual loading, public holiday pay and leave entitlements.

The Federal Circuit Court imposed penalties of $20,000 on the farm operator and $110,000 on the company. The employer was also penalised for failing to provide employees with access to the applicable Pastoral Award 2010. Although the workers were eventually back-paid in full, the case highlighted the serious consequences of failing to understand and comply with workplace obligations.

Case facts

Operator penalised $20,000 and the company has been penalised a further $110,000.

The company underpaid 6 backpackers a total of $38,254 between January, 2014 and September, 2015.

The backpackers had worked up to 13 hours a day, six or seven days a week, but were mostly paid a flat rate of $17 an hour for all hours worked, resulting in significant underpayment of their overtime entitlements.

Three of the backpackers did not have a single day off during their employment, respectively working 64, 80 and 88 consecutive days.

Under the Pastoral Award 2010, the backpackers should have been paid up to $37.96 per hour for overtime work.

The six backpackers were underpaid between 28 and 51 per cent of their total minimum entitlements and the largest individual underpayment was $11,592.

What they should have done

The company should have better understood employees rights under the relevant award and minimum entitlements included within the award and NES.

How Happy HR could have helped

Award Interpretation

Qualified HR consultants can interpret relevant awards and entitlements.
Learn more →

HR compliance support

Guidance on minimum rates, overtime, leave and conditions.
Learn more →

Better HR practices

Consistent processses to help prevent underpayment and reduce compliance risk.
Learn more →

Happy HR ROI
$130,000 penalty = 43 years of Happy HR subscription

Based on a 50-person company; plus countless hours saved on administration and in Fair Work!
Learn more →

Got questions?​

Frequently asked questions​

A Queensland beef cattle farm operator and its company were penalised $130,000 after underpaying six overseas backpackers a total of $38,254. The workers were paid a flat hourly rate despite regularly working overtime, with some working up to 88 consecutive days without a day off. The Federal Circuit Court imposed penalties following legal action by the Fair Work Ombudsman.

The workers were mostly paid a flat rate of $17 per hour for all hours worked, including overtime. This meant they did not receive their correct entitlements under the Pastoral Award 2010, including overtime rates, ordinary wages, casual loading, public holiday pay and leave entitlements.

The employer should have understood and applied the correct award rates and employment conditions, accurately calculated overtime and other entitlements, maintained appropriate employee records, and ensured workers received their required days off. They should also have made the applicable Pastoral Award available to employees.

Happy HR could have supported the business with award interpretation, HR compliance guidance and better employment practices. With access to qualified HR support, the employer could have better understood its obligations, identified potential compliance issues and established more consistent processes for managing employee entitlements.

Discover how better HR support could help agriculture businesses avoid costly Fair Work claims

Want a direct comparison against your current HR system?

Tell us which platform you use today and what you want to improve. We have many new clients that come from other platforms to Happy HR.
We can demonstrate the relevant Happy HR capabilities, discuss integration and implementation requirements, and help you assess whether the platform is the right fit.

Get an instant AI demo now!

Harry, our AI guide will walk you through Happy HR live and answer all your questions. Your private demo opens up in a new tab and runs for up to 15 minutes. Available 24/7.

+61

Get a call from sales now

Put your details in and our AI sales expert will call you straight back. Available 24/7.

+61